Beyond prevention: seeing both sides of critical risk
Discover how bow-tie functionality separates Preventative and Recovery Controls, reveals critical-risk gaps and supports better incident learning and control assurance.
Discover how bow-tie functionality separates Preventative and Recovery Controls, reveals critical-risk gaps and supports better incident learning and control assurance.
Most businesses claim to have a safety system – there’s a risk register; policies and procedures., incident reporting and maybe even a dashboard or two. On the surface, it looks like you have everything covered but if you were to step back for a moment and look at your system – would you be clear on the critical risks in your business that could seriously harm or kill someone?
Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS) are supposed to be the backbone of managing high-risk work. In theory, they outline the hazards, controls, and steps required to keep workers safe. In reality, most SWMS documents die a slow death in gloveboxes, Dropbox folders, and faded clipboards.
In too many businesses, health and safety still lives under the umbrella of compliance; a set of procedures that must be followed to satisfy the law, completed because it’s expected, not because it’s valued. The forms are filled, the boxes are ticked, the files are stored, and the day carries on. And that works – until something goes wrong.
When we talk about critical risks in the workplace, we’re not talking about paper cuts or sprained ankles – we’re talking about the kinds of risks that, if they go unmanaged, could cause serious injury or death.